Net Neutrality Options

[CommanderSpartan]

I was surfing the net when I came across this.

The Commission may exercise this “ancillary” authority only if it demonstrates that its action—here barring Comcast from interfering with its customers’ use of peer-to-peer networking applications—is “reasonably ancillary to the . . . effective performance of its statutorily mandated responsibilities…”

The Commission has failed to make that showing. It relies principally on several Congressional statements of policy, but under Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit case law statements of policy, by themselves, do not create “statutorily mandated responsibilities.” The Commission also relies on various provisions of the Communications Act that do create such responsibilities, but for a variety of substantive and procedural reasons those provisions cannot support its exercise of ancillary authority over Comcast’s network management practices. We therefore grant Comcast’s petition for review and vacate the challenged order.

This pretty much means ISPs can regulate our internet experience. They can make us pay extra to play online games, for downloads, and can block any site that they don't like or that don't pay them.

Sh*t.

[jadems]

Well, this is trying to be done in Australia too.

But seeing as most of the world's internets are held in America, I think this would also affect the world.

[OmegaBolt]

But seeing as most of the world's internets are held in America, I think this would also affect the world.

Rofl.

[Rampastring]

Well, it won't be affecting anything here in Finland and some of these restrictions can be likely bypassed.

This post has been edited by ^Rampastein: Apr 7 2010, 01:06 PM