Tell EA Games What You Think! Options

[Aztek985]

Want EA Games to finally hear your voice? Well according to an e-mail they just sent out, now is your chance.

We'd like to invite you to tell us your thoughts about your playing habits and gaming experiences with Command & Conquer and EA.

Our survey should only take a couple minutes to complete and will help influence the future design of our games. All of your answers and feedback for this survey will remain confidential.

Clicking the link below will take you right to the survey where you can send off your thoughts to EA Games. Please share your thoughts about the survey on the discussion board.

http://fun.ea.com/cgi-bin24/DM/y/hshB0LBR4v0OvW0CH5s0Ef

EDIT: After completing the survey, we have collected the fact that the next CNC (CNC4) will be the last game made in the Tiberium series. But the good news, well, another CNC is in the making! There was also some information about what EA wants to include into the game, including MMORG and RPG type style campaigns, new units including one called "the Crawler" which is a mobile deployable base, multiplayer campaigns, as well as objectives into online and skrimish games. Guess we'll have to stay tuned for official word of mouth when the time comes.

[jadems]

I just want moar FMVs.
Can't get enough of Joe Kukan

[Rampastring]

I just want moar FMVs.

I want better quality of FMVs and battle scenes after completing missions (like in TD & RA1, TS also had those after some missions).
I also want the TD/RA1-like map selection screens back and better music, they were some of the things that created the nice atmosphere in TD and RA1 (TS also has a map selection screen, but in my opinion it isn't as cool as TD's one).

I'm not expecting much from them to be honest, they've failed me too many times in the past (RA2, Renegade, Generals, TW, and now RA3).

I also think that if C&C4 will sell well, they will continue the serie.

The clock speed, specified in the CPU name... they dont ask for my actual clock speed??? (I think 1.8 differs alot from my OC 2.8 GHz...?)

Hmm, yeah, and the actual power of the processor depends much more in the technology than clock speeds (Compare some old Pentium D or an Athlon 64 X2 running at 2 GHz with a Core 2 Duo running at 2 GHz and you'll understand what I mean).

This post has been edited by ^Rampastein: Jun 25 2009, 08:25 AM