IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


> More flying building expiramentation
Ditch the flying buildings?
read the first post bfore voting ;)
Yeah, ditch em [ 4 ] ** [30.77%]
Don't ditch, we need flying buildings! [ 9 ] ** [69.23%]
Spinach, or green beans?
Spinach [ 9 ] ** [69.23%]
Green Beans [ 4 ] ** [30.77%]
Total Votes: 13
Guests cannot vote 
Team Black
post Jun 28 2007, 12:29 AM
Post #1


Core Defender
Group Icon

Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,841
Joined: 23-October 06
From: New York, U S of A
Member No.: 123
Alliance: GDI
Favorite game: Tiberian Sun



We know that we can't use actual aircraft, since they don't follow deploy logic- but there are a few ways to make aircraft out of vehicles:

1st idea: adjust the hover locomotor. Reading through Jah's heli research, I thought I'd give my own shot at it (I wasn't expecting to succeed where he had failed - rather, just to know for myself what does and doesn't work)

By adjusting the HoverHeight for the hover loco, you can make a convincing looking aircraft, with the ability to deploy. There are many minuses (which are described in Jah's thread), but they can all be overcome with some tweaking. However, there is a key issue that remains: cliff passability.
By making the terrain
CODE
; cliffs
[Rock]
Foot=0%
Track=0%
Wheel=0%
Float=0%
Hover=100%
Amphibious=0%
Buildable=no

it does not enable the unit to descend or ascend cliffs, only to move on them in the same level.
Attached File  livin_on_the_edge.PNG ( 96.67K ) Number of downloads: 4

This also causes some compliance issues with hover units- it's difficult to get them to go places, especially if a cliff is involved in the process.

VERDICT: using the hover logic is phayl.

2nd idea: make the vehicle fly. this is done by giving it an aircraft's locomotor, SpeedType=winged, and MovementZone=fly.
This method allows for aircraft to support every logic that vehicles support: deploying, passengers, hva animation, shp, turrets, etc.
The cons:
It is invincible during flight - unless it runs into a firestorm wall (not even hunter-seekers can get em)
It can't reveal shroud while in flight - but this might not be a big problem, if we make them MoveToShroud=no.
it can be picked up by carryalls - but I wouldn't really see that as a gameplay-threatening issue
Attached File  invincible_balloon.PNG ( 40.93K ) Number of downloads: 3

The invincibility thing might be balanced if we make em go really really slow, but even then, ehhhhhhh roll.gif
If we were to make mobile buildings though, this would be the best way to do it (unless the exe hackers feel like getting planes able to deploy/undeploy. . .)

MY VERDICT: flying buildings in TS would be great, but it isn't going to happen. Even if it did work, it would already throw the game's balance to heck.

So what now? I'd hate to say it, but I'm leaning towards ditching the mobile buildings altogether, but I'm going to need some feedback before I decide anything...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
: | +Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Lightstorm
post Jul 14 2007, 01:53 AM
Post #2


Tick Tank
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 3-February 07
From: the far side of dawn,
Member No.: 768
Alliance: Forgotten
Favorite game: Tiberium Wars



yeah i say we just use regular build tree and have the ships fly down and deploy as the construction animation.


--------------------
Join My forum (please??)
Go to the top of the page
 
: | +Quote Post
Lin Kuei Ominae
post Jul 14 2007, 09:13 AM
Post #3


Stealth Tank
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,065
Joined: 14-November 06
From: Germany
Member No.: 281
Alliance: CABAL
Favorite game: Tiberian Sun



sorry that i find everytime something against your ideas lightstorm, but this, even if it would be cool, isn't really possible in TS.
Because you have only a max of 25 frames for a buildup. And for a smooth looking landing animation there are much more needed.

But why we don't stick with the initial idea? All Scrin buildings are Flying Units that deploy.
Those Ships can all be build as units from the conyard using a dummy building.
To avoid using the deploy anim for the buildup, we use invisible dummy buildings that selfdestruct after buildup and give via Freeunit= the scrin ship. The Dummybuilding can then have the construction buildup anim for the ship.

Scrin Mothership (a smaller one than the main armada flagship) -> Conyard (with upgrades for energy, radar, silo (if possible) and other stuff)
Scrin Warship -> Warfactory
Scrin Troopship -> Barracks
Scrin Carrier -> Air Command (each Carrier deploys into a Scrin helipad)
Scrin Techship -> Tech Centre
Scrin Collector -> Refinery

Scrin Base defense via deployable other ground and air units.

This post has been edited by Lin Kuei Ominae: Jul 14 2007, 09:22 AM


--------------------
Co-Leader of Twisted Insurrection
my public units for you
Nod units:____________________________GDI units:
Nod Scorpion__________________________GDI 3A Kodiak
Nod Tachyon Tank______________________GDI Medusa (Triple Cannon Mech)
Nod Goliath___________________________GDI Behemoth (medium size Mech)
Nod Cobra (fast medium mech)__________GDI Battleship Aurora
Nod Siegebot (light MG-Mech)__________GDI Fortress Tower (Heavy Base Defense)
Nod Redeemer (4 legged heavy Cyborg)__GDI Triton (Titan support Mech)
Nod/Scrin WotW Tripod_________________GDI Exciter
______________________________________GDI Ion Charge Collector
Misc and Fun units:
X-Mech Calendar 28 SHP Units
Star Wars Mechs ATAT/ATST
Cyborg Barrack on PPM_________________Mech Factory
Mutant Tiberium Flyer
yt1300 (Millenium Falcon + BIG version)

if you use my units in your mod, please credit me.if you want to use my units on your website please ask me before.
Go to the top of the page
 
: | +Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Team Black rocks   More flying building expiramentation   Jun 28 2007, 12:29 AM
- - jadems   LOL, I wouldn't cross them out entirely, how a...   Jun 28 2007, 12:50 AM
- - Lightstorm   idea 1: when a mobile building is in flight is ris...   Jun 28 2007, 01:43 AM
|- - Lin Kuei Ominae   idea 1. i don't see a way how this should work...   Jun 28 2007, 10:19 AM
- - Lightstorm   i still think carryalls are our best bet, we don...   Jun 28 2007, 01:03 PM
|- - Lin Kuei Ominae   would you then give the undeployed building speed=...   Jun 28 2007, 01:20 PM
- - Lightstorm   i would use the same carryall for everything, it w...   Jun 28 2007, 01:35 PM
|- - Lin Kuei Ominae   The Scrin use normal tanks too. How do you want to...   Jun 28 2007, 02:37 PM
- - Lightstorm   can't you set it so certain units can't be...   Jun 28 2007, 03:32 PM
- - Team Black rocks   Yeah, there's no way to limit what a carryall ...   Jun 28 2007, 03:47 PM
- - Blacksilence   ooh then you skip a carryall for the scrin side   Jun 28 2007, 03:57 PM
|- - Lin Kuei Ominae   i would say yes, no carryall for buildings. (But w...   Jun 28 2007, 05:23 PM
- - jadems   So do we have flying buildings or not? And LKO th...   Jul 12 2007, 12:51 AM
- - Lightstorm   we could just scratch them altogether. that might ...   Jul 12 2007, 02:00 AM
- - Master Blackster   No need for EXE hacks, Miss Lights in my "A...   Jul 12 2007, 03:04 AM
- - Lightstorm   cool. note: all AA defenses are now weaker railgun...   Jul 12 2007, 01:40 PM
- - Roadwarrior   but, the scrin should have one building on the gro...   Jul 12 2007, 04:11 PM
- - Lightstorm   I'd say the scrin wouldn't have that limit...   Jul 12 2007, 04:18 PM
- - Roadwarrior   it would balance it i think   Jul 12 2007, 04:20 PM
- - Master Blackster   Well we can make the railgun part invisible, takin...   Jul 12 2007, 08:37 PM
- - jadems   So what your saying is: MCV turns into a Warfactor...   Jul 12 2007, 09:38 PM
- - Lightstorm   i just couldn't see building ships that fly fr...   Jul 14 2007, 02:20 PM
- - jadems   I can see the Scrin player's having a really g...   Jul 14 2007, 10:53 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2025 - 07:12 AM


XGhozt.com